Skip to content

support full range of info available with --name-status #993

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

oetiker
Copy link

@oetiker oetiker commented May 8, 2024

when running with --name-status I really would like to see all the info available, this is why I am running with this option.

new properties returned are oldname and similarity.

the regular expression is improved by using a non-capturing group for the optional 4th element of the response

when running with `--name-status` I really would like to see all the info available, this is why I am running with this option.

new properties returned are `oldname` and `similarity`.

the regular expression is improved by using a non-capturing group for the optional 4th element of the response
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 8, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 9b1500d

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

steveukx added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
…en getting a log/diff with the `--name-status` option.

Closes #993
@steveukx
Copy link
Owner

Hi, thank you for the pull request. Apologies it took so long to respond.
Since you opened this there has been a similar change in the diff summary parser, so I've incorporated your similarity field with the other change that added from for the previous name of the file (to match the field name from "previous file name" in other move operations).

@steveukx steveukx closed this in 52f767b Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants