Skip to content

ci: switch to linux free arm runners #135633

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2025
Merged

Conversation

marcoieni
Copy link
Member

@marcoieni marcoieni commented Jan 17, 2025

Linux free arm runners are now available. We can use them instead of the large runners.

r? @ghost

try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: aarch64-gnu-debug
try-job: dist-aarch64-linux

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 17, 2025
@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
ci: switch to linux free arm runners

try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: aarch64-gnu-debug
try-job: dist-aarch64-linux
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 17, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 0e80d78 with merge db10fad...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 17, 2025

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: db10fad (db10fadf722349574c72f209ee9b3476a9bf1223)

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

wow, nice!
image

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

trying again just to be sure.

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 17, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 0e80d78 with merge afa8729...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
ci: switch to linux free arm runners

try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: aarch64-gnu-debug
try-job: dist-aarch64-linux
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 17, 2025

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: afa8729 (afa872906a8ccf6a1b5d52c5495e21405e32a866)

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

r? @Kobzol

@marcoieni marcoieni marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2025 22:06
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Jan 17, 2025

Looks like there is enough disk space left at the end of the job, and the jobs also seem fast enough, so great! Hopefully it will stay working like this 😆 Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 17, 2025

📌 Commit 0e80d78 has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 17, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 18, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 0e80d78 with merge c304f76...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2025
ci: switch to linux free arm runners

try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: aarch64-gnu-debug
try-job: dist-aarch64-linux
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-fuchsia failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
+ .jiri_root/bin/jiri import -name=integration -revision=bb38af4e3d45e490531b71fc52a460003141d032 -overwrite=true flower https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/integration
+ '[' -d .git ']'
+ .jiri_root/bin/jiri update -autoupdate=false
[03:27:24.551] Updating all projects
[03:29:13.265] Wait for 1m4s before next attempt...: Cloning https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km

ERROR: 'git clone --no-checkout --filter=blob:none https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km /checkout/obj/fuchsia/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km' failed:

stderr:
stderr:
Cloning into '/checkout/obj/fuchsia/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km'...
fatal: repository 'https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km/' not found
command fail error: exit status 128


[03:30:17.265] Attempt 2/3: Cloning https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km

ERROR: 'git clone --no-checkout --filter=blob:none https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km /checkout/obj/fuchsia/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km' failed:

stderr:
stderr:
Cloning into '/checkout/obj/fuchsia/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km'...
fatal: repository 'https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km/' not found
command fail error: exit status 128


[03:30:17.433] Wait for 1m4s before next attempt...: Cloning https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km

[03:31:21.488] Attempt 3/3: Cloning https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km

[03:31:21.761] Jiri packages are not fetched due to fatal errors when updating projects.
[03:31:21.761] Jiri hooks are not run due to fatal errors when updating projects or packages
ERROR: Creating project "third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km": "Cloning https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km" failed 3 times in a row, Last error: 'git clone --no-checkout --filter=blob:none https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km /checkout/obj/fuchsia/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km' failed:

stderr:
stderr:
Cloning into '/checkout/obj/fuchsia/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km'...
fatal: repository 'https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/third_party/imgtec-pvr-rgx-km/' not found
command fail error: exit status 128
  local time: Sat Jan 18 03:31:21 UTC 2025
  network time: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 03:31:21 GMT
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 18, 2025

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 18, 2025
@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Jan 18, 2025

@bors retry

fuchsia not working

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 18, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 18, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 0e80d78 with merge 1d55f72...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 19, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Kobzol
Pushing 1d55f72 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 19, 2025
@bors bors merged commit 1d55f72 into rust-lang:master Jan 19, 2025
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.86.0 milestone Jan 19, 2025
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (1d55f72): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.9% [0.9%, 0.9%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.9% [0.9%, 0.9%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 764.993s -> 765.786s (0.10%)
Artifact size: 326.02 MiB -> 326.08 MiB (0.02%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants