numpy comparison-with-callable / no-member confusion

[belm0]

appears to be a recent regression

e.g.:

if numpy.random.random() < 0.5:
   pass

W0143: Comparing against a callable, did you omit the parenthesis? (comparison-with-callable)

and

result = numpy.logical_and(...)
result.fill_value = 0
avg = numpy.mean(result.filled())

E1101: Function 'any' has no 'filled' member (no-member)

pylint --version output

pylint 2.3.1
astroid 2.2.2
Python 3.7.1 (default, Nov  6 2018, 18:45:35)
[Clang 10.0.0 (clang-1000.11.45.5)]

numpy 1.16.2

[belm0]

This and #2694 lead me to believe that pylint would greately benefit from a continuous build having tests for simple code using numpy.

[PCManticore]

Thanks for the report, this is fixed in astroid's master. While having some simple tests with numpy on pylint's side would help, I'm not sure who can do that given that I don't use numpy personally.

[belm0]

Thank you. When would the Astroid fix make it into a release?

A project I'm working on has been blocked from upgrading pylint for a while due to the successive regressions with numpy.

[PCManticore]

Just released astroid 2.2.3 with this fix. Sorry to hear that, do you have by any chance a list of regressions that caused you to be blocked? Would be great to open some issues for them if we don't have them already opened.

[belm0]

Thank you for making another release.

I just had some concern that the release might take a while as for #2694.