-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.4k
repl: change preview default in case of custom eval functions #31259
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
BridgeAR
wants to merge
1
commit into
nodejs:master
from
BridgeAR:2020-01-08-repl-deactivate-previews-with-custom-eval
Closed
repl: change preview default in case of custom eval functions #31259
BridgeAR
wants to merge
1
commit into
nodejs:master
from
BridgeAR:2020-01-08-repl-deactivate-previews-with-custom-eval
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Custom eval functions might have a very different behavior than the current implementation and having a preview in such case might be confusing. This changes the preview default to `false` in case a custom eval function is used. It is still possible to opt into using the previews in case that's still desirable.
targos
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2020
antsmartian
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2020
lpinca
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2020
addaleax
approved these changes
Jan 9, 2020
devsnek
approved these changes
Jan 9, 2020
Trott
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2020
jasnell
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2020
Trott
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 10, 2020
Custom eval functions might have a very different behavior than the current implementation and having a preview in such case might be confusing. This changes the preview default to `false` in case a custom eval function is used. It is still possible to opt into using the previews in case that's still desirable. PR-URL: #31259 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Landed in 9530362 |
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2020
Custom eval functions might have a very different behavior than the current implementation and having a preview in such case might be confusing. This changes the preview default to `false` in case a custom eval function is used. It is still possible to opt into using the previews in case that's still desirable. PR-URL: #31259 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Merged
Looks like this is blocked on #31112. |
targos
pushed a commit
to targos/node
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2020
Custom eval functions might have a very different behavior than the current implementation and having a preview in such case might be confusing. This changes the preview default to `false` in case a custom eval function is used. It is still possible to opt into using the previews in case that's still desirable. PR-URL: nodejs#31259 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2020
Custom eval functions might have a very different behavior than the current implementation and having a preview in such case might be confusing. This changes the preview default to `false` in case a custom eval function is used. It is still possible to opt into using the previews in case that's still desirable. PR-URL: #31259 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Custom eval functions might have a very different behavior than the
current implementation and having a preview in such case might be
confusing. This changes the preview default to
false
in case acustom eval function is used. It is still possible to opt into using
the previews in case that's still desirable.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes