Introduces recipe as computed property in RecipeView #522
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
seyfeb
force-pushed
the
maintenance/RecipeAsComputedProperty
branch
from
41d06a5 to
0346312
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #522 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 0.87% 0.87%
Complexity 436 436
========================================
Files 14 14
Lines 1375 1375
========================================
Hits 12 12
Misses 1363 1363
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
seyfeb
force-pushed
the
maintenance/RecipeAsComputedProperty
branch
from
0346312 to
a05b54c
Compare
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Fey <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Fey <[email protected]>
christianlupus
force-pushed
the
maintenance/RecipeAsComputedProperty
branch
from
a05b54c to
2b85dee
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
see discussion in #497, here