feat: better DOM parsing and highlighting #488
Conversation
RohitR311
added
Type: Bug
WalkthroughThe pull request refactors the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client as Caller
participant Selector as getElementInformation
participant DOM as document.elementsFromPoint
participant Finder as findDeepestElement
Client->>Selector: Call getElementInformation(x, y)
Selector->>DOM: Invoke document.elementsFromPoint(x, y)
DOM-->>Selector: Return array of elements
Selector->>Finder: Call findDeepestElement(elements)
Finder-->>Selector: Return deepest element
Selector->>Selector: Process shadow DOM/frames
Selector-->>Client: Return element information and rect
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Note 🎁 Summarized by CodeRabbit FreeYour organization has reached its limit of developer seats under the Pro Plan. For new users, CodeRabbit will generate a high-level summary and a walkthrough for each pull request. For a comprehensive line-by-line review, please add seats to your subscription by visiting https://app.coderabbit.ai/login.If you believe this is a mistake and have available seats, please assign one to the pull request author through the subscription management page using the link above. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
server/src/workflow-management/selector.ts (7)
30-55: Consider refactoring repeated logic into a shared helper.The
findDeepestElementfunction is duplicated in multiple places. Extracting it into a shared function in a common utility file or module could simplify maintenance, reduce code duplication, and unify behavior across usage sites.
310-315: Repeated pattern noted.This block mirrors the earlier code for retrieving elements. Consider extracting a utility to handle
elementsFromPointand the subsequent checks.
316-340: DuplicatefindDeepestElementlogic.Again, consider consolidating shared logic into a reusable function to reduce repetition and potential inconsistencies.
604-605: Improves multi-element detection.Similar duplication; consider moving repeated logic to a shared utility.
607-634: RecurrentfindDeepestElementlogic.Suggest factoring out the shared routines given the repeated code block.
828-829: Repeated multi-element approach.Again, worthwhile to unify this logic to minimize duplication.
831-858: SamefindDeepestElementblock repeated.Refactor into a single, well-tested helper for ease of updates.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
server/src/workflow-management/selector.ts(20 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (21)
server/src/workflow-management/selector.ts (21)
27-29: Good enhancement usingdocument.elementsFromPoint.This allows retrieving all elements at the specified coordinates, providing more accurate depth determination compared to
document.elementFromPoint.
59-60: Looks good.The check and immediate return for
nullensures safe upstream usage.
83-83: No changes needed here.Variable assignment is straightforward and poses no issues.
93-94: Correct approach to handle iFrame detection.Using
deepestElement.tagName === 'IFRAME'helps correct iFrame handling for further nested logic.
124-124: Frame detection is still valid although frames are legacy.The conditional logic checks for frames or framesets, which remain relevant in some legacy contexts.
127-128: Properly collecting frame elements.This ensures frames are queued for further processing.
343-343: All good.Assigning the deepest element to a local variable for further references is clear and concise.
366-366: No issues with this assignment.Simple variable assignment—no concerns.
376-377: Consistent iFrame check.This block aligns with the approach used in other segments for iFrame handling.
410-411: Frames are handled consistently.Pushing the frame to the array ensures further traversal if needed.
461-461: Shadow DOM traversal is properly invoked.Allows further refining the deepest element within shadow roots.
636-637: Function call and null check look good.This ensures safe handling of cases with no matching elements.
660-660: No further suggestions.Simple, harmless variable assignment.
670-671: Proper iFrame logic again.Continuing the consistent iFrame processing approach.
704-705: Frame detection remains consistent.Reuses the same patterns for frames.
755-755: Shadow DOM traversal is properly updated.Ensures deepest element is continually refreshed.
860-861: Straightforward usage.No issues; the flow remains consistent.
884-884: No changes needed.Simple local assignment; safe to ignore.
894-895: Exact iFrame check repeated.Continues the established pattern for iFrame depth checks.
928-929: Consistent frame detection again.Maintaining parity with other frame checks.
979-979: Shadow DOM re-traversal.Implementation remains consistent across repeated patterns.
amhsirak
added
Scope: Ext
|
@amhsirak Review |
Summary by CodeRabbit