Skip to content

Fix a typo in example_custom_operators #285

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2024

Conversation

madprog
Copy link
Contributor

@madprog madprog commented Apr 13, 2024

In the crossover function, the split point is chosen in the range of the offspring size, instead of the solution size.

An out-of-range split point is silently ignored by the range selection: it selects all genes from parent1, and none from parent2. However, the error can be demonstrated by throwing an exception if the split point is out of range.

In the crossover function, the split point is chosen in the range of the
offspring size, instead of the solution size.

An out-of-range split point is silently ignored by the range selection:
it selects all genes from parent1, and none from parent2.
However, the error can be demonstrated by throwing an exception if the
split point is out of range.
@ahmedfgad ahmedfgad merged commit 272aaa5 into ahmedfgad:master Apr 14, 2024
ahmedfgad added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2025
1. The `delay_after_gen` parameter is removed from the `pygad.GA` class constructor. As a result, it is no longer an attribute of the `pygad.GA` class instances. To add a delay after each generation, apply it inside the `on_generation` callback. #283
2. In the `single_point_crossover()` method of the `pygad.utils.crossover.Crossover` class, all the random crossover points are returned before the `for` loop. This is by calling the `numpy.random.randint()` function only once before the loop to generate all the K points (where K is the offspring size). This is compared to calling the `numpy.random.randint()` function inside the `for` loop K times, once for each individual offspring.
3. Bug fix in the `examples/example_custom_operators.py` script. #285
4. While making prediction using the `pygad.torchga.predict()` function, no gradients are calculated.
5. The `gene_type` parameter of the `pygad.helper.unique.Unique.unique_int_gene_from_range()` method accepts the type of the current gene only instead of the full gene_type list.
6. Created a new method called `unique_float_gene_from_range()` inside the `pygad.helper.unique.Unique` class to find a unique floating-point number from a range.
7. Fix a bug in the `pygad.helper.unique.Unique.unique_gene_by_space()` method to return the numeric value only instead of a NumPy array.
8. Refactoring the `pygad/helper/unique.py` script to remove duplicate codes and reformatting the docstrings.
9. The plot_pareto_front_curve() method added to the pygad.visualize.plot.Plot class to visualize the Pareto front for multi-objective problems. It only supports 2 objectives. #279
10. Fix a bug converting a nested NumPy array to a nested list. #300
11. The `Matplotlib` library is only imported when a method inside the `pygad/visualize/plot.py` script is used. This is more efficient than using `import matplotlib.pyplot` at the module level as this causes it to be imported when `pygad` is imported even when it is not needed. #292
12. Fix a bug when minus sign (-) is used inside the `stop_criteria` parameter (e.g. `stop_criteria=["saturate_10", "reach_-0.5"]`). #296
13. Make sure `self.best_solutions` is a list of lists inside the `cal_pop_fitness` method. #293
14. Fix a bug where the `cal_pop_fitness()` method was using the `previous_generation_fitness` attribute to return the parents fitness. This instance attribute was not using the fitness of the latest population, instead the fitness of the population before the last one. The issue is solved by updating the `previous_generation_fitness` attribute to the latest population fitness before the GA completes. #291
@ahmedfgad ahmedfgad mentioned this pull request Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants