Skip to content

[CLIENT-3161] Add client config option to validate keys passed into client config and policy dictionaries #729

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 36 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

juliannguyen4
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@juliannguyen4 juliannguyen4 changed the base branch from master to dev February 20, 2025 16:40
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 20, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 68.57143% with 22 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.64%. Comparing base (f24bbee) to head (72dae54).
Report is 4 commits behind head on dev.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/main/client/type.c 69.56% 14 Missing ⚠️
src/main/aerospike.c 66.66% 8 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #729      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.71%   81.64%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          98       98              
  Lines       14474    14542      +68     
==========================================
+ Hits        11827    11873      +46     
- Misses       2647     2669      +22     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@juliannguyen4 juliannguyen4 removed the request for review from rbotzer April 9, 2025 17:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants