-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
Handle human-generated non-OSM labels #32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@lewfish Raster Vision is great! I haven't checked it out deeply since the segmentation focus switch but will try to give it a read again soon. I do think non-OSM labels are within the scope of |
Uncompress mbtiles line by line, close #32
Closed the wrong issue with my commit |
I second this! I would be very nice if label-maker can support custom labels. |
Closed via #109 |
I work on Raster Vision at Azavea and this library seems to handle some of the same functionality. We create object detection training chips from GeoTIFFs and human-generated GeoJSON label files, and I'm thinking about how to extend
label-maker
to do this. Do you think this would be in the scope oflabel-maker
, or is the focus just on generating labels from OSM data? Handling human-generated label files would make the library more general and usable with pre-existing benchmark datasets, for instance. I saw that there's an issue (#13) for handling GeoTIFFs instead of TMS URLs, which would be step one. The next step would be handling GeoJSON labels, or GeoTIFFs in the case of segmentation. Or maybe the right approach is to convert our data into vector tiles which this library already handles.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: